

Anymore jason bourne movies series#
that means that the 007 series is no part of the Highlander series? SF the man was shot and fell from a deadly height. True but both instances in QoB were deadly, the poor execution of the badly copied actionscene from MR (NO CGI by the way) could not have been survived period. Then there is all the car chases Bourne has and yet is still able to move affectively enough when a regular person would be battered beyond imagination. Weisz are escaping police and he slides through the gap in the alley walls only to land directly on the policemen at the bottom of the drop with not an injury taken afterwards. Well Bourne's jump at the end of Ultimatum could be argued to be a little deadly, as is Cross's jump when he and Ms. I hate it when the laws of gravity spoil a spy-thriller. I agree that it is not as farfetched as Craig's 007 who keeps falling from deadly hights and keeps surviving it (QoB & SF). This is not so far as the invisible car IMO, when scifi gets in the way of what one would plausibly expect from a spy thriller. I don't think I am missing anything then. Although I shouldn't say "just." The training produced uber-deadly agents. Yes, Bourne was just a highly trained Treadstone op. I saw Cross as an agent part of a new effort post Bourne and Treadstone that was testing human genetic enhancement for their agents. The Bourne film trilogy barely stay true to the Ludlum novels in any way shape or form, so that really isn't a strong argument in any sense.īourne isn't genetically improved like Cross I don't know where people got that idea. On another note, I would really love to see "The Ambler Warning" go to the big screen, because this does have the twists and turns the audience expects from this genre, and the book was an original by Robert Ludlum, it was though archived as unfinished and completed by another author and editor, but would equal the original films with the right production and actors. I know I have said it before, but this probably goes back to the story not being a Robert Ludlum original. I am not sure that the more recent offering "The Bourne Legacy" had the same substance backing the plot of the previous three, so I felt it was somewhat predictable, even though the production quality and acting was there to provide the new film credibility. The first 3 Bourne films were great, with a real atmosphere and Matt Damon secured a certain template for the series, just like Sean did with Bond.
